The damage the HOAX IS doing to children in Canada as we speak.
Children permanently damaged by Plandemic HOAX
13 thoughts on “Children permanently damaged by Plandemic HOAX”
Leave a Reply
Blogging fulltime since 2013 about the things they don't want you to know.
Greencrow as the crow flies 
Excellent video posted above:
From the heart and to the point.
These will be our future leaders.
OMG….
LikeLike
SHOCK: Woman Injured by Covid Vaccine Exposes Incompetent VAERS System (Video)
https://rairfoundation.com/shock-woman-injured-by-covid-vaccine-exposes-incompetent-vaers-system-video/
==================
COMMENT:
WOW….highly recommended video
.
Many of us are aware VAERS is under-reported/or only 1% of cases are reported.
This video submits that there is a massive bureaucratic gauntlet to bypass…..by design….which explains the aforementioned low reporting..
LikeLiked by 1 person
Greencrow, thank you for all your posts. I love your feisty fortitude and your honest views. Appreciate your informed friends sharing as well. Grateful to be on your mailing list. Many blessings on the journey. Love, Okanagangoddess (Librti)
LikeLiked by 2 people
More than one-quarter of Canadians support jail time for the unvaccinated, new poll finds
The survey also found that 66% of Canadians are in favour of mandatory COVID shots for everyone over the age of five.
https://www.rebelnews.com/more_than_one-quarter_of_canadians_support_jail_time_for_the_unvaccinated_new_poll_finds
QUOTE:
“………..A majority of Canadians have little-to-no sympathy for their fellow citizens who are unvaccinated, a new national survey finds.
According to the poll, which was conducted by Maru Public Opinion on January 14 and 15 and surveyed an online panel of 1,506 Canadians, 54% of respondents said they have no sympathy for an unvaccinated person who becomes seriously ill or dies as a result of contracting COVID.
Further, a plurality of Canadians were found to be in favour of fierce punishments for the unvaccinated — with 37% of respondents saying it would be acceptable to deny the unvaccinated access to any publicly-funded hospital or medical services, and 27% saying they would support a short jail sentence for those who refuse the injection.
Other punishments for the unvaccinated that were considered in the poll include barring the unvaccinated from entering most public spaces (77% in favour), making them pay out of pocket the full medical cost of visits to hospital due to COVID (61% in favour), a special tax on the unvaccinated (such as has been announced in Quebec) of up to $150 per month (61% in favour) and refusing the renewal of their driver’s license (33% in favour).
The survey also found that 66% of Canadians are in favour of mandatory COVID shots for everyone over the age of five. Federal Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos said earlier this month that mandatory vaccination is likely coming soon, and something that provincial governments should be discussing.
Interestingly, when broken down by province, those 66% of Canadians who responded as being in favour of mandatory vaccination are most likely to be found in both British Columbia (75%) and Atlantic Canada (75%), followed by those living in Manitoba/Saskatchewan (71%), then Québec (67%), Ontario (62%), and Alberta (57%).
The study also explored the reasons why Canadians feel so harshly toward their neighbours who remain unvaccinated. The poll states:
Canadians view the unvaccinated as responsible for overwhelming the health care system (48%), people who are holding Canadians back from having a new normal life (40%), endangering society (36%), misguided conspiracy theorists (36%), good people with legitimate reasons/concerns (27%), reckless (26%), super-spreaders of the virus (17%), and/or heroes for free speech/choice (12%). In addition, A majority (54%) say they don’t have sympathy for the unvaccinated who get seriously ill or die from COVID.
For the 9% of respondents who admitted to being unvaccinated, the study further explored why they have thus far refused a COVID shot.
In contrast, for those who remain unvaccinated, their reasons for doing so are varied and numerous: they are defending their civil liberty to make a choice for themselves (45%), waiting on more data to see if it is truly safe for them to get the vaccine (42%), believing their immune system can beat COVID so there is no need for it (32%), being anxious/scared as to what it could do to them (28%), not wanting government telling them what to do (22%), being concerned about the potential impact to their genetic structure (21%), not wanting something foreign put in their body (15%), that it’s a hoax—it’s just a bad flu, not a killer (9%), and/or it’s just what drug companies have concocted to get rich (7%)……”
====================================
COMMENT:
Personally, I think the pro-vaxx figures are inflated , highly skewed and very suspect…their sample pool is only 1500 people from across Canada
Regardless…we have to watch our backs
LikeLiked by 1 person
Was that poll taken before Christmas? I do believe some dim bulbs lit up after so many vaxxZed cam down with CovID over the holidays. As time goes on and the adverse events pile up…perhaps the worm will turn on this one. Sad to think that we have to hope that our loved ones will come down with adverse health reactions so they’ll wake up!!!
LikeLike
Ontario court rules father cannot criticize COVID vaccines around 10-year-old son
Anything that ‘calls into question the safety or efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine’ is not allowed, the Ontario Superior Court ruled.
https://www.rebelnews.com/ontario_court_rules_father_cannot_criticize_covid_vaccines_around_10_year_old_son
QUOTE:
“……..An Ontario judge has issued a gag order forbidding a father from criticizing the federal vaccination program within earshot of his 10-year-old son, Blacklock’s Reporter shares. Anything that “calls into question the safety or efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine” is not allowed, the Ontario Superior Court ruled.
“I find [the boy] is receiving mixed messages about the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine and that at 10 years of age he is unable to make an informed choice,” wrote Justice Francine Van Melle. The Court granted the urgent motion requested by the boy’s mother.
According to court records, the couple divorced in 2013. The mother, a teacher, wanted the boy to get the shot since “she is worried about sending the child back to school for in-person learning next week without him being vaccinated,” the Court was told.
Justice Van Melle noted the father complained “the government was forcing people to be vaccinated against COVID,” that “there is no benefit to children to receive the COVID vaccine” and that he wanted to “wait until further evidence is available regarding the safety of the vaccine.”
Justice Van Melle ruled that the mother could vaccinate her son, and went further in issuing a gag order prohibiting the father from questioning the government’s vaccine program with his son. “He is not to tell or suggest to [the boy] directly or indirectly that COVID-19 vaccines are untested, unsafe or ineffective or that he is particularly at risk from them,” wrote Van Melle.
“He shall not permit any other person to have any such discussion to make any suggestion to [his son] directly or indirectly,” said the Court. “He is prohibited from showing the child social media sites, websites, other online information, literature or any other material that calls into question the safety or efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines or to permit any other person to do so.”
The Court also ordered that the father can take counsel only from a single approved medical professional when it comes to his son’s care, ruling that he “shall not involve any medical doctor other than Dr. Aaron Smith in this aspect of [the child’s] care.”
The key section of Justice Van Melle’s ruling reads in full as follows:
Taking all of these considerations into account, I find that it is in [the child’s] best interests that [the mother] be given sole decision-making authority on the issue of [the child’s] COVID-19 vaccinations. [The father] is not to tell or suggest to [the child] directly or indirectly that the COVID-19 vaccines are untested, unsafe, ineffective or that he is particularly at risk from them. He shall not permit any other person to have any such discussions, or to make any suggestion to [the child], directly or indirectly. He is prohibited from showing the child social media sites, websites, other online information, literature or any other material that calls into question the safety or efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines or to permit any other person to do so. [the father] shall not involve any medical doctor other than Dr. Aaron Smith in this aspect of [the child’s] care.
The order follows a December 23 ruling by a Québec Superior Court judge who suspended weekend visitation rights to prevent an unvaccinated father from seeing his fully vaccinated 12-year-old son. “The best interests of the child must guide the Court,” wrote Justice Sebastien Vaillancourt of Montréal.
“The child is vaccinated so he has some protection against the virus,” wrote Justice Vaillancourt. “Is this enough to allow him to rub shoulders with his father? The Court finds this is not the case.”
==============================================
COMMENT
Very disturbing….intriguing how many of such cases have the fathers opposed to vaxx, and pro-vaxx mothers tend to win out. What is going on with the mothers???
I posted before that the justice system is either useless and/or dangerous “Playing Doctor” and putting burden of proof on pro-choice types.
This sets more and more precedent for Communism, no one has any rights over their bodies.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is sometimes hard to believe that others have suffered more pain and anguish than you and I over this nightmare, RAH…but this story puts it all into perspective. Can you imagine the hell that father is going through?
LikeLike
Greencrow,
I watche Max Igan’s latest video while in exile in Mexico.
He’s still homeless.
The Kazakh people went ape shit over the ‘vaccine’ mandate. Not what the MSM tells you, the MSM tells us it’s about energy prices. They literally dragged their ‘government’ out into the street and exiled them!
I wish he would quit telling us how stupid Biden is. Biden told the world that you can drive an electric car across the US on a ‘FULL TANK OF GAS’. We know how stupid, venal, corrupt and evil he is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like your term “went ape shit”, Bob. That’s a real 60’s expression…my era too.
LikeLike
I ordered some Sportiva hiking shoes. Very pricey but I can’t endure another year of being cloistered and not being able to go into my beloved Shenandoah.
The US Park Service was fining people thousands for violating the Cofraud rules last year. People in the most fantastic places worried about masks and other bullshit.
Max Igan is right, it’s time to start looking for some rope!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for posting this Bob. I used to think it was an Irish song but now understand it’s American. One of the most beautiful of the traditional classic songs.
LikeLike
This post was picked up by What Really Happened today (Jan 12th). Good to see it there.
LikeLike
Oops, that was supposed to be Jan 20th. Can’t easily read what I’m typing in this thin box.
LikeLike